Table 1.
Scenarioa | Number of reference animalsb | Number of imputed animals | Description of reference animals | Density of reference panelc | Imputed group breedd | Density of panel of imputed animals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1_5K50K | 500 | 116 | Romney | 50K | Romney | 5K |
1B_5KHD_1STEP | 500 | 116 | Romney | HD | Romney | 5K |
1B_5KHD_2STEP | 17,000 + 500 | 116 | Romney | HD | Romney | 5K |
2_50KHD | 500 | 116 | Romney | HD | Romney | 50K |
3_5K50K | 469 | 116 | Romney-31 animals related with the imputed group | 50K | Romney | 5K |
3B_5KHD | 469 | 116 | Romney-31 animals related with the imputed group | HD | Romney | 5K |
4_50KHD | 469 | 116 | Romney-31 animals related with the imputed group | HD | Romney | 50K |
5_5K50K | 500 (R) + 100 (P) | 116 | Romney + Perendale | 50K | Romney | 5K |
5B_5KHD | 500 (R) + 100 (P) | 116 | Romney + Perendale | HD | Romney | 5K |
6_50KHD | 500 (R) + 100 (P) | 116 | Romney + Perendale | HD | Romney | 50K |
aImputation scenarios were from 5K to 50K (50K was a subset of the HD panel), 5K to HD and 50K to HD
b2-Step imputation: from 5K to 50K using all genotyped animals as reference population (N = 17,000) and from 50K imputed to HD using 500 animals as the reference population
cThe oldest animals in each scenario were used as reference population
dThe youngest animals in each scenario were imputed