Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 23;48:71. doi: 10.1186/s12711-016-0244-7

Table 1.

Imputation scenarios with HD genotypes using different groups of purebred and crossbred animals

Scenarioa Number of reference animalsb Number of imputed animals Description of reference animals Density of reference panelc Imputed group breedd Density of panel of imputed animals
1_5K50K 500 116 Romney 50K Romney 5K
1B_5KHD_1STEP 500 116 Romney HD Romney 5K
1B_5KHD_2STEP 17,000 + 500 116 Romney HD Romney 5K
2_50KHD 500 116 Romney HD Romney 50K
3_5K50K 469 116 Romney-31 animals related with the imputed group 50K Romney 5K
3B_5KHD 469 116 Romney-31 animals related with the imputed group HD Romney 5K
4_50KHD 469 116 Romney-31 animals related with the imputed group HD Romney 50K
5_5K50K 500 (R) + 100 (P) 116 Romney + Perendale 50K Romney 5K
5B_5KHD 500 (R) + 100 (P) 116 Romney + Perendale HD Romney 5K
6_50KHD 500 (R) + 100 (P) 116 Romney + Perendale HD Romney 50K

aImputation scenarios were from 5K to 50K (50K was a subset of the HD panel), 5K to HD and 50K to HD

b2-Step imputation: from 5K to 50K using all genotyped animals as reference population (N = 17,000) and from 50K imputed to HD using 500 animals as the reference population

cThe oldest animals in each scenario were used as reference population

dThe youngest animals in each scenario were imputed