Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 22;60:10.3402/fnr.v60.32594. doi: 10.3402/fnr.v60.32594

Table 7.

Evaluation of quality of life using RAND 36-Item Health Survey

Variable Mean Lower Upper Mean change Lower Upper p
Physical functioning
 Baseline 75.7 69.3 82.1
 Week 12 86.5 80.1 92.9 10.8 4.9 16.7 <0.001
 Week 28 85.3 78.4 92.2 9.6 3.2 16.1 0.004
Physical role functioning
 Baseline 74.2 60.7 87.6
 Week 12 78.3 64.9 91.8 4.2 −9.8 18.1 0.555
 Week 28 73.3 57.7 88.8 −0.9 −16.9 15.1 0.911
Bodily pain
 Baseline 72.8 62.9 82.8
 Week 12 79.7 69.1 90.3 6.9 −1.6 15.3 0.109
 Week 28 80.3 69.1 91.5 7.5 −1.8 16.7 0.112
General health
 Baseline 58.7 51.2 66.1
 Week 12 68.7 60.4 76.9 10.0 4.2 15.8 <0.001
 Week 28 67.7 58.9 76.5 9.0 2.5 15.5 0.007
Vitality
 Baseline 56.2 48.1 64.3
 Week 12 66.7 56.2 77.1 10.5 2.5 18.5 0.011
 Week 28 68.4 59.3 77.5 12.2 6.1 18.4 <0.001
Social functioning
 Baseline 78.4 70.6 86.3
 Week 12 89.3 79.8 98.8 10.9 4.3 17.4 0.001
 Week 28 87.4 77.4 97.3 8.9 1.8 16.1 0.015
Emotional role functioning
 Baseline 81.1 71.3 90.9
 Week 12 84.5 71.6 97.3 3.4 −9.1 15.8 0.592
 Week 28 83.8 69.7 97.8 2.7 −11.0 16.3 0.699
Mental health
 Baseline 73.2 67.0 79.4
 Week 12 82.0 75.3 88.7 8.8 3.2 14.4 0.003
 Week 28 78.6 71.8 85.3 5.4 −0.4 11.1 0.067

n=30. The percentage scores range from 0% (lowest or worst possible level of functioning) to 100% (highest or best possible level of functioning). The mean values, mean changes, and 95% confidence interval with upper and lower limits are given for eight health concepts at inclusion (baseline); 12 weeks after diet intervention; and 16 weeks after the end of diet intervention (week 28). Comparisons were made between each time point and baseline by using linear mixed effect models. A value of p<0.05 is considered statistically significant.