Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Endod. 2016 Aug 25;42(10):1467–1471. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.07.010

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Results of HSPA1L and HSPA6 in silico analysis of SNP function. A, HSPA1L rs2075800 results in a glutamine to lysine substitution at position 602 of the protein (E602K) that is considered potentially damaging; B, HSPA6 rs1042881 located in the 3′ UTR is predicted to have different binding affinity to the microRNA hsa-miR-4290. Albeit not significant, the C allele appears to have increased affinity to hsa-miR-4290.