Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 Aug 10;50:135–142. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.08.003

Table 2.

Initial study aims and final study aims based on stakeholder input.

Aim Initial study aims Final study aims revised based on
stakeholder input
1 Compare the effects of the “On the
Move” group exercise program to a
standard group exercise program on
walking ability
Compare the effects of the “On the Move”
group exercise program to a standard
group exercise program on self-reported
function and disability and walking
ability.
2 When delivered by staff activity
personnel, assess the effectiveness of
“On the Move” compared to a standard
program; and sustainability compared
to delivery by exercise leaders.
3 Compare the acceptability and the
risks of the “On the Move” and
standard exercise programs.
Compare the acceptability and the risks of
the “On the Move” and standard exercise
programs delivered by exercise leaders
and staff activity personnel.
4 Explore potential baseline predictors of
benefit and risks of participation in “On
the Move” program to facilitate
informed patient decision making