Table 2. The fit of 4 models to the observed distribution of recurrent SNVs in the three different genomic fractions (A) TE, (B) NTE and (C) EX.
The median shape parameters are given for models 1b and 2b and the median eta are given for models 2b.
| Model | N | Log-likelihood | Shape | ε |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Exon TE (TE) | ||||
| 1a | 2 | −269283.00 | 0.13 | |
| 1b | 64 | −2935.80 | 0.12 | |
| 2a | 3 | −266889.00 | 0.00021 | 0.956 |
| 2b | 96 | −1302.31 | 0.00016 | 0.959 |
| Non-Exon Non-TE (NTE) | ||||
| 1a | 2 | −227728.00 | 0.31 | |
| 1b | 64 | −1206.53 | 0.37 | |
| 2a | 3 | −227026.00 | 0.00039 | 0.963 |
| 2b | 96 | −565.92 | 0.00026 | 0.972 |
| Exon (EX) | ||||
| 1a | 2 | −13877.9 | 0.18 | |
| 1b | 64 | −270.47 | 0.22 | |
| 2a | 3 | −13843.30 | 0.00019 | 0.966 |
| 2b | 96 | −240.68 | 0.00035 | 0.958 |
Notes.
- N
- number of parameters
Italics indicate the best fit as determined by a likelihood ratio test.