Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 1;26(9):1173–1184. doi: 10.1089/thy.2016.0141

Table 5.

Correlations Between Thyroid Hormone Levels and Cognitive Measures in LT4 Treated Subjects

    fT4 fT3 TSH
  Test Coefficient p-Value Coefficient p-Value Coefficient p-Value
Declarative memory Paragraph Recall Test            
  Immediate 1.07 0.20 −0.005 0.93 0.19 0.38
  30 min delay 0.89 0.31 0.02 0.71 0.20 0.40
Executive function Letter Cancellation Test            
  Time (sec) −4.97 0.33 −0.04 0.90 2.04 0.13
  % with no errors 15% 0.81 −8% 0.13 5% 0.77
  Trail Making Test            
  Time (sec) 1.67 0.40 0.26 0.05 0.31 0.56
  ABC time (sec) −0.54 0.92 0.08 0.83 −1.04 0.46
  % with errors −23% 0.72 1% 0.82 25% 0.27
  % with ABC errors −41% 0.32 6% 0.17 −14% 0.33
  Iowa Gambling Task            
  Net-1 0.04 0.99 −0.03 0.88 1.65 0.02
  Net-2 −1.68 0.50 0.08 0.63 −0.44 0.50
  Net-3 −1.46 0.59 −0.07 0.71 0.25 0.73
  Net-4 −0.94 0.75 0.02 0.94 −1.05 0.17
  Net-5 −2.10 0.48 −0.09 0.67 −1.11 0.16
Executive function (working memory) N-Back            
  No. correct on target            
  1-Backa 66% 0.38 −6% 0.13 24% 0.20
  2-Backa −9% 0.84 0.5% 0.90 16% 0.29
  3-Back −0.27 0.66 0.01 0.77 −0.18 0.30
  N-Back            
  No. incorrect/nontarget            
  1-Backa −66% 0.08 3% 0.56 –30% 0.05
  2-Backa 6% 0.92 −1% 0.82 −8% 0.59
  3-Back –1.05 0.04 −0.03 0.37 0.004 0.98
  Subject Ordered Pointing            
  No. of errors            
  6 0.11 0.32 0.001 0.85 −0.02 0.50
  8 −0.04 0.83 −0.002 0.90 −0.0004 0.99
  10 0.17 0.46 −0.001 0.94 0.03 0.67
  12 −0.12 0.70 0.01 0.73 −0.06 0.43
Motor learning Pursuit Rotor Trial            
  Time on target (sec)            
  1 0.52 0.88 0.05 0.83 −0.09 0.93
  2 1.74 0.60 0.01 0.96 0.41 0.65
  3 0.04 0.99 0.07 0.77 −0.18 0.85
  4 3.03 0.37 −0.16 0.49 −0.04 0.97
  Motor Sequence Learning Test            
  Total movement time (sec) −59.05 0.45 7.20 0.16 −2.49 0.90

Individual tests are grouped by cognitive subdomains (first column).

Correlations were analyzed by repeated measures methodology using separate models for each hormone.

Positive coefficients indicate that the measure increased with increasing hormone levels, while negative coefficients indicate that the measure decreased with increasing hormone levels.

For continuous cognitive measures, the magnitude of the coefficient indicates the estimated change in the measure with a 1 unit increase in fT4 or TSH, or a 10 unit increase in fT3.

For binary cognitive measures, coefficients were transformed to estimate the percent change in the predicted odds of the measure for a 1 unit increase in fT4 or TSH, or a 10 unit increase in fT3. The transformed coefficients are estimates of the risk ratios associated with the 1 or 10 unit increase in the respective hormone level.

p-Values for continuous outcomes were adjusted for age, years of education, WAIS-R, BMI, estrogen status, LT4 time, LT4 dose time, and LT4 dose (μg/kg). Significant coefficients are shown in bold with corresponding p-values.

a

These values were calculated as proportion of subjects for which each measure was ≥15 (for correct target) or >0 (for incorrect/nontarget), since there were floor effects. The N-Back p-values for comparing groups do not include 3-Back since this variable was not calculated as a proportion.