Table 5.
Relationship between socio-demographic proxies of vulnerability and opinions about (a) tobacco packaging and (b) the presence of complete bans on smoking in the home estimated using logistic regression .
| Socio-Demographic Group | More Information on Tobacco Packaging | Complete | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cigarettes | Smokeless | Bidis | Home Ban | |||||
| (n = 3296) | (n = 3300) | (n = 3305) | (n = 5176) | |||||
| Adj % | (AOR) | Adj % | (AOR) | Adj % | (AOR) | Adj % | (AOR) | |
| Sex | ||||||||
| Men | 72.2 | — | 73.5 | — | 71.9 | — | 63.8 | — |
| Women | 58.9 | (0.52) | 60.1 | (0.51) | 58.2 | (0.51) | 51.7 *** | (0.55) |
| Residence | ||||||||
| Urban non-slum | 60.8 | — | 61.7 | — | 61.2 | — | 63.2 | — |
| Rural | 68.2 | (1.42) | 70.2 | (1.52) | 68.2 | (1.41) | 65.8 | (1.14) |
| Slum | 85.7 *** | (4.29) | 85.5 *** | (4.14) | 82.8 *** | (3.41) | 39.3 | (0.34) |
| Education | ||||||||
| 9+ years | 76.6 | — | 79.8 | — | 78.9 | — | 69.0 | — |
| 1–8 years | 75.0 | (0.91) | 76.2 | (0.80) | 73.6 | (0.73) | 62.3 * | (0.72) |
| Illiterate | 60.6 *** | (0.44) | 61.0 *** | (0.37) | 60.5 *** | (0.38) | 50.7 *** | (0.42) |
| Income | ||||||||
| ≥10,000 BDT | 73.3 | — | 75.2 | — | 74.6 | — | 63.2 | — |
| 5000–9999 BDT | 73.6 | (1.02) | 75.0 | (0.99) | 73.4 | (0.93) | 57.5 | (0.76) |
| <5000 BDT | 62.2 | (0.58) | 62.4 * | (0.52) | 63.1 * | (0.56) | 49.5 * | (0.52) |
| not reported | 55.4 | (0.43) | 55.4 | (0.38) | 49.7 | (0.31) | 63.8 | (1.03) |
Notes: * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001; test difference in adjusted percentages between each group and the reference group (—). Logistic regression models controlled for additional factors not shown here, including sampling area, tobacco use and age group. Adj %: model-based adjusted percentages that control for all other factors in the model. AOR: adjusted odds ratio controlling for all other factors in the model. Models based on current and former tobacco users only.