Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 25;13(9):849. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13090849

Table 3.

Results of the spatial multivariable regressions indicating the relationship between EJ variables and swine AU density in CBGs (Model 1) and the relationship between EJ variables and swine AU density after controlling for population density (Model 2). Statistically significant variables are bolded. AIC = Akaike Information Criterion; LL = log likelihood.

Model 1
Variable Coefficient Std. Error z-Value p-Value
W_Swine/SqMile 0.786 0.014 52.993 0.000
Constant −23.132 21.751 −1.063 0.287
Percent Non-White −121.147 56.102 −2.159 0.031
Percent No College 95.765 32.958 2.906 0.003
Percent Poverty −112.504 59.524 −1.890 0.058
AIC = 27,599.6, LL = −13,794.8
Model 2
Variable Coefficient Std. Error z-Value p-Value
W_Swine/SqMile 0.779 0.015 51.620 0.000
Constant −3.467 22.639 −0.153 0.878
Percent Non-White −67.665 58.853 −1.149 0.250
Percent No College 73.952 33.857 2.184 0.029
Percent Poverty −87.767 60.136 −1.459 0.144
Population density −0.009 0.003 −3.106 0.002
AIC = 27,592.2, LL = −13,790.1