Table 3.
Results of the spatial multivariable regressions indicating the relationship between EJ variables and swine AU density in CBGs (Model 1) and the relationship between EJ variables and swine AU density after controlling for population density (Model 2). Statistically significant variables are bolded. AIC = Akaike Information Criterion; LL = log likelihood.
Model 1 | ||||
Variable | Coefficient | Std. Error | z-Value | p-Value |
W_Swine/SqMile | 0.786 | 0.014 | 52.993 | 0.000 |
Constant | −23.132 | 21.751 | −1.063 | 0.287 |
Percent Non-White | −121.147 | 56.102 | −2.159 | 0.031 |
Percent No College | 95.765 | 32.958 | 2.906 | 0.003 |
Percent Poverty | −112.504 | 59.524 | −1.890 | 0.058 |
AIC = 27,599.6, LL = −13,794.8 | ||||
Model 2 | ||||
Variable | Coefficient | Std. Error | z-Value | p-Value |
W_Swine/SqMile | 0.779 | 0.015 | 51.620 | 0.000 |
Constant | −3.467 | 22.639 | −0.153 | 0.878 |
Percent Non-White | −67.665 | 58.853 | −1.149 | 0.250 |
Percent No College | 73.952 | 33.857 | 2.184 | 0.029 |
Percent Poverty | −87.767 | 60.136 | −1.459 | 0.144 |
Population density | −0.009 | 0.003 | −3.106 | 0.002 |
AIC = 27,592.2, LL = −13,790.1 |