Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Aug 22;84(10):913–921. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000131

Table 1.

Capable Families and Youth Project Interventions

Intervention Theory Goals Training process Delivery Adherence to content/tasks/activities

Life Skills Training (LST)
Social learning theory (Bandura, 1977); problem behavior theory (Jessor & Jessor, 1977) Skill development (social resistance, self-management, general social skills) and knowledge regarding avoidance of substance misuse Interactive teaching techniques, homework, behavioral rehearsal (a) University-trained teachers conducted the 15 session program (a) 85%
(b) Five booster sessions one year later (b) 82%
(c) Four 11th grade booster sessions for a randomly-selected half of the schools (c) 77%

Strengthening Families Program: For Parents and Youth 10–14 (SFP 10–14)
Biopsychosocial Model Empirically-based risk/protective factors originating in the family (Molgaard et al., 2000) Reduce youth substance misuse and other problem behaviors; enhance parenting skills (nurturing, limit-setting, and communication); enhance youth skills (prosocial, peer resistance) Interactive with videotaped modeling of positive behavior; each session required one parent and two youth facilitators (a) University-trained facilitators conducted seven 1-hour concurrent youth and parent sessions, plus 1-hour conjoint sessions for 137 families (a) 98% families, 92% parents, 94% youth
(b) Four booster sessions offered one year later (69% of families attended ≥1 session) (b) 97% families, 94% parents, 96% youth
(c) Booster sessions for a randomly-selected half of the schools included: videotape and handout on effective parenting with self-assessment questionnaire; family-school resource fair and resource directory; student goal-setting seminar (c) 68% return on self-assessment, 40% attendance for resource fair, 65% of students attended goal-setting seminar