Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 27;8(9):621–626. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i9.621

Table 1.

Recent successful studies managed minimally invasively after acute or chronic anastomotic leak

Ref. Year Cases Procedure Gender (F/M) Age (yr) Previous diagnose or treatment Success n (%) Failure or complications n (%) Follow-up
Lamazza et al[13] 2015 22 SEMS 11/11 68 Anterior resection (all) Neoadjuvant (21) 19 (86.4) Failure: 3 (13.6) Stent migration: 1 (4.5) 18-42 mo
Arezzo et al[19] 2012 14 OTSC 8/6 68.5 Anterior resection (12) Colostomy closure (1) Right hemicolectomy (1) 12 (85.7) 1 patient needed further surgery 4 mo
Sulz et al[20] 2014 6 OTSC 1/5 66.5 Colorectal resection 5 (83.3) Failure: 1 (Succeeded with 2nd OTSC) N/A
Weidenhagen et al[25] 2008 29 VAC 5/24 66.7 Rectal cancer (22) Rectosigmoidal cancer (3) Large rectal adenoma (2) Diverticulitis (1) Endometrial cancer infiltration (1) 28 (96.6) 1 (Hartmann’s procedure) VAC duration: 34.4 ± 19.4 d
Blumetti et al[31] 2011 5 Transanal repair N/A 52 Coloanal anastomosis (4) Colorectal anastomosis (1) 4 (80) Failure: 1 (20) Time to repair: 8-15 mo

F/M: Female/male; SEMS: Self-expandable metallic stent; OTSC: Over the scope clip; N/A: Data not available; VAC: Vacuum-assisted closure.