Table 2.
Entire feature space: Average testing set error rate and sparsity (in parentheses) for 10 random partitions of the data
| Dataset | SCM | LinSVM | PolySVM | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. difficile | ||||
| Azithromycin | 0.030 (3.3) | 0.050 (32 752 570) | 0.048 (32 752 570) | 0.446 |
| Ceftriaxone | 0.073 (2.6) | 0.079 (25 405 987) | 0.076 (25 405 987) | 0.306 |
| Clarithromycin | 0.011 (3.0) | 0.053 (32 752 570) | 0.053 (32 752 570) | 0.446 |
| Clindamycin | 0.021 (1.4) | 0.039 (30 988 214) | 0.039 (30 988 214) | 0.136 |
| Moxifloxacin | 0.020 (1.0) | 0.054 (32 752 570) | 0.048 (32 752 570) | 0.390 |
| M. tuberculosis | ||||
| Ethambutol | 0.179 (1.4) | 0.215 (9 465 489) | 0.221 (9 465 489) | 0.351 |
| Isoniazid | 0.021 (1.0) | 0.117 (9 701 935) | 0.119 (9 701 935) | 0.421 |
| Pyrazinamide | 0.318 (3.1) | 0.382 (8 058 479) | 0.382 (8 058 479) | 0.347 |
| Rifampicin | 0.031 (1.4) | 0.200 (9 701 935) | 0.204 (9 701 935) | 0.452 |
| Streptomycin | 0.050 (1.0) | 0.143 (9 282 080) | 0.148 (9 282 080) | 0.435 |
| P. aeruginosa | ||||
| Amikacin | 0.175 (4.9) | 0.184 (116 441 834) | 0.179 (116 441 834) | 0.216 |
| Doripenem | 0.270 (1.4) | 0.288 (122 438 059) | 0.281 (122 438 059) | 0.359 |
| Levofloxacin | 0.072 (1.2) | 0.221 (122 216 859) | 0.225 (122 216 859) | 0.463 |
| Meropenem | 0.267 (1.6) | 0.329 (123 466 989) | 0.331 (123 466 989) | 0.404 |
| S. pneumoniae | ||||
| Benzylpenicillin | 0.013 (1.1) | 0.015 (8 968 176) | 0.015 (8 968 176) | 0.073 |
| Erythromycin | 0.037 (2.0) | 0.046 (9 666 898) | 0.047 (9 666 898) | 0.142 |
| Tetracycline | 0.031 (1.1) | 0.039 (8 657 259) | 0.037 (8 657 259) | 0.106 |
Results are shown for the SCM and the kernel methods: LinSVM and PolySVM. The baseline method predicts the most abundant class in the training set. The smallest error rates are in bold