Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 8;12(4):2555–2559. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.4974

Table II.

Correlation between CD168 OE and clinicopathological parameters of 78 colorectal patients.

CD168 OE

Parameter (−), n (+), n P-value
Gender 0.04
  Male 46   6
  Female 18   8
Age, years 0.62
  <65 34   7
  ≥65 29   8
Tumor location 0.20
  Colon 29   9
  Rectum 35   5
Histological differentiation 0.41a
  Well-differentiated 25   1
  Moderately-differentiated 27   9
  Poorly-differentiated 12   4
Tumor stage 0.67b
  T1   1   0
  T2   6   1
  T3 24   6
  T4 33   7
Lymph node involvement 0.78c
  N0 34   8
  N1 22   2
  N2   8   4
Metastasis 0.23
  M0 60 13
  M1   4   1
TNM staged 0.78e
  I   4   1
  II 30   7
  III 26   5
  IV   4   1
a

Well- and moderately-differentiated vs. poorly-differentiated.

b

T1+T2 vs. T3+T4.

c

N0 vs. N1+N2.

d

aAmerican Joint Committee on Cancer staging system.

e

I+II vs. III+IV. (−), negative overexpression; (+), positive overexpression; CD168, cluster of differentiation 168; OE, overexpression; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis.