Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 23;60(10):6234–6243. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00633-16

TABLE 5.

Proportion of subjects with favorable clinical responsea

Parameter Result for treatment group, % (n/m)
REL vs placebo comparison, % difference (95% CI)b
250 mg REL + IMI 125 mg REL + IMI Placebo + IMI 250 mg REL + IMI 125 mg REL + IMI
ME population
    DCIV 96.3 (78/81) 98.8 (85/86) 95.2 (79/83) 1.1 (−6.2 to 8.6)* 3.7 (−2.0 to 10.8)*
    EFU 94.9 (75/79) 94.2 (81/86) 96.3 (78/81) −1.4 (−9.1 to 6.0) −2.1 (−9.7 to 5.3)
    LFU 93.7 (74/79) 95.3 (81/85) 94.9 (75/79) −1.3 (−9.6 to 6.9) 0.4 (−7.2 to 8.2)
MITT population
    DCIV 89.9 (80/89) 91.7 (88/96) 90.2 (83/92) −0.3 (−9.6 to 8.9)§ 1.4 (−7.2 to 10.3)*
    EFU 86.5 (77/89) 88.5 (85/96) 89.1 (82/92) −2.6 (−12.7 to 7.2) −0.6 (−10.0 to 8.9)
    LFU 87.6 (78/89) 89.6 (86/96) 85.9 (79/92) 1.8 (−8.5 to 12.0) 3.7 (−5.9 to 13.6)
a

n/m, number of subjects with favorable clinical response/number of subjects with clinical response assessment; CI, confidence interval; DCIV, discontinuation of i.v. therapy; EFU, early follow-up (5 to 9 days after completion of i.v. study therapy); LFU, late follow-up (28 to 42 days after completion of i.v. study therapy).

b

The 95% CIs for between-treatment differences and associated P values are based on the unconditional asymptotic Miettinen and Nurminen method without stratification. *, P < 0.001; §, P = 0.002. (A P value of <0.025 indicates REL plus IMI is noninferior to control.)