Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 2;12(4):2664–2673. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.4932

Table II.

Comparison of FOXM1 and Hh signaling molecules in tumors and normal tissues.

Squamous cell carcinoma Adenocarcinoma


Protein IOD (mean ± SD) P-valuea IOD (mean ± SD) P-valueb P-valuec
FOXM1 (2.27±1.64)×105 <0.001 (1.39±1.17)×105 0.014 0.340
SHh (3.27±0.95)×105 <0.001 (3.38±0.37)×105 0.007 0.743
SMO (1.89±1.16)×105 <0.001 (1.58±0.84)×105 0.007 0.743
GLI1 (1.33±0.96)×105 <0.001 (1.41±0.73)×105 0.014 0.620
PTCH1 (1.71±0.58)×105 <0.001 (1.97±0.17)×105 0.007 0.236
a

Squamous cell carcinoma compared with normal tissues.

b

Adenocarcinoma compared with normal tissues.

c

Squamous cell carcinoma compared with adenocarcinoma. FOXM1, forkhead box M1; Hh, hedgehog; SHh, Sonic Hh; SMO, smoothened; GLI1, glioma-associated oncogene 1; PTCH1, patched 1; IOD, integrated optical density; SD, standard deviation.