Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 2;12(4):2664–2673. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.4932

Table III.

Association between FOXM1 expression and clinicopathological characteristics.

Characteristics Patients, n (%) IOD (mean ± SD) P-value
Pathological stagea
  Well/moderately differentiated 47 (67.14) (2.18±1.72)×105 0.512
  Poorly differentiated 19 (27.14) (2.48±1.45)×105
Invasive extentb
  Stage 1 22 (31.43) (1.54±1.49)×105 0.011c
  Stage 2 20 (28.57) (2.34±1.36)×105 0.103d
  Stage 3 28 (40.00) (2.71±1.75)×105 0.421e
Lymph node statusf
  N0 44 (62.86) (2.09±1.60)×105 0.408
  N1 24 (34.29) (2.44±1.72)×105
Age, years
  ≤40 20 (28.57) (2.72±1.71)×105 0.033g
  41–56 41 (58.57) (2.20±1.63)×105 0.230h
  ≥56   9 (12.86) (1.33±0.99)×105 0.143i
a

Pathological stage was undetermined in 4 patients.

b

According to the American Joint Committee on Cancer classification. Equal variance, Fisher's least significant difference test:

c

Stage 3 vs. stage 1

d

stage 1 vs. stage 2

e

stage 2 vs. stage 3

f

Lymph node status was undetermined in 2 patients.

g

patients in the ≤40-year-old group compared with patients in the ≥56-year-old group

h

patients in the ≤40-year-old group compared with patients in the 41–56 years old group

i

patients in the 41–56-year-old compared with patients in the ≥56-year-old group. IOD, integrated optical density; SD, standard deviation.