Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 12;12(4):2613–2621. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.5004

Table III.

Significance of the mean methylation of MSP-methylated cervical lesions compared with that of MSP-unmethylated control samples for the investigated nucleotides.

Nucleotide P-value and lower bound of 95% CI
−57 0.0409*; 0.0017
−52 0.0648; −0.0025
−45 0.0093*; 0.0107
−36 0.1375; −0.0080
−13 0.0196*; 0.0090
+6 0.0654; −0.0017
+9 0.0462*; 0.0005
+36 0.1032; −0.0069
+60 0.1086; −0.0078
+70 0.0358*; 0.0033
+75 0.0381*; 0.0021
+80 0.0278*; 0.0053
+84 0.0683; −0.0031
+90 0.0671; −0.0029
+93 0.0438*; 0.0010
+103 0.1383; −0.0127
+107 0.1963; −0.0153
+110 0.0243*; 0.0034
+116 0.1256; −0.0114

H0 (null hypothesis), the mean methylation level of sample with MSP methylated CDH1 is equal to the mean methylation level of MSP unmethylated control sample; HA, the mean for MSP methylated CDH1 promoter is higher than the mean of MSP unmethylated control sample. P-value for the Welch's two sample t-test and lower bound of the one-sided 95% confidence interval. CI, confidence interval; MSP, methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction.