Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 27;11(9):e0163330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163330

Table 3. Aβ1–42 binding to CAP37, neutrophil elastase, and cathepsin G.

1–42 (nM) Log binding
CAP37 Neutrophil elastase Cathepsin G
0
  • -0.907±0.139**

  • p = 0.005

  • -1.061±0.114 ns

  • p = 0.119

  • -0.884±0.103 ***

  • p = 0.0004

3.47
  • -0.556±0.047 ****

  • p<0.0001

  • -0.961±0.139 ns

  • p = 0.169

  • -0.368±0.157 ****

  • p<0.0001

6.93
  • -0.389±0.051 ****

  • p<0.0001

  • -0.890±0.127 *

  • p = 0.0064

  • -0.152±0.162 ****

  • p<0.0001

13.89
  • -0.138±0.047 ****

  • p<0.0001

  • -0.720±0.151 **

  • p = 0.0064

  • 0.019±0.165 ****

  • p<0.0001

27.78
  • 0.137±0.043 ****

  • p<0.0001

  • -0.414±0.154 ****

  • p<0.0001

  • 0.151±0.149 ****

  • p<0.0001

55.56
  • 0.304±0.039 ****

  • p<0.0001

  • -0.146±0.153 ****

  • p<0.0001

  • 0.310±0.125 ****

  • p<0.0001

111
  • 0.377±0.075 ****

  • p<0.0001

  • 0.123±0.176 ***

  • p = 0.0004

  • 0.541±0.002 ****

  • p<0.0001

Log Aβ1–42 binding is shown as mean± SEM. A two-way ANOVA was performed with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test so that binding of Aβ1–42 to each protein was compared to binding of Aβ1–42 to BSA.

*p<0.05

**p<0.01

***p<0.001

****p<0.0001