Skip to main content
. 2016 May 27;31(11):2119–2126. doi: 10.1007/s00467-016-3413-6

Table 2.

Comparison of selected demographic and clinical variables between the infants born with extremely low birth weight (ELBW children) and infants born at term (control children)

Demographic and clinical variables Control (full term) group (n = 36) Study (ELBW) group (n = 64) p valuea
Demographic variables
   Female 17 (47 %) 43 (67 %) 0.06b
   Birth weight (g) 3570 (3395–3880) 875 (750–960) <0.01c
   Gestational age (weeks)) 40 (39–40) 27 (25–28) <0.01c
   Vaginal delivery 31 (86 %) 13 (20 %) <0.01b
   Multiple pregnancy 0 9 (14 %) 0.024b
   Small for gestational age 2 (6 %) 19 (30 %) 0.004b
First follow-up (at age 7 years)
   Age at evaluation (years); median (25th-75th percentile) 6.9 (6.4–7.4) 6.5 (6.4–6.8) 0.04c
   Height (cm) 124 ± 7.4 116 ± 6.3 <0.01d
   Height (z score) 0.21 ± 1.0 −1.08 ± 1.3 <0.01d
   Weight (kg) 25.2 ± 5.3 19.5 ± 3.8 <0.01d
   Weight (z score) 0.26 ± 1.2 −0.92 ± 1.3 <0.01d
Second follow-up (at age 11 years)
   Age at evaluation (years) 10.7 (10.2–11.1) 11 (10.8–11.3) 0.01c
   Height (cm) 146 ± 8 141 ± 8 <0.01d
   Height (z score) 0.20 ± 1.1 −0.88 ± 1.2 <0.01d
   Weight (kg) 40.4 ± 9.9 33.7 ± 8.2 <0.01d
   Weight (z score 0.24 ± 1.2 −0.92 ± 1.3 <0.01d

Data are presented as the number of patients with the percentage given in parenthesis, the median with the IQR given in parenthesis and the mean ± standard deviation (SD), as appropriate

aStatistical significance was defined at the p = 0.05 level for the two-sided test

b p value using the Fisher exact test

c p value using the Mann–Whitney U test

d p value using Student’s t test