Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 13;5(3):e181. doi: 10.2196/resprot.6089

Table 1.

Demographics and baseline characteristics.

Charachteristica Total
(N=1319)
Financial incentives/ EG1
(n=626)
Charitable incentives/ EG2
(n=562)
Control group/ CG
(n=131)
P Effect sizeb
Group characteristics

Number of cantons 26 8 11 7


Number of customers contacted 18,638 7487 8216 2935


Population densityc (residents/km2, median) 233.56 255.15 173.45 221.08

Demographic variables

Age 42.95 (13.11) 43.06 (13.25) 42.50 (12.88) 44.37 (13.40) .36 .002

Gender (%) .89 .01


Female 585 (44.35) 285 (45.53) 244 (43.42) 56 (42.75)



Male 635 (48.14) 301 (48.08) 270 (48.04) 64 (48.85)



Not declared 99 (7.51) 40 (6.39) 48 (8.54) 11 (8.40)


Educationd (%) .17 .10


University 597 (45.26) 301 (48.08) 244 (43.42) 51 (39.69)



Professional School 421 (31.92) 194 (30.99) 188 (33.45) 39 (29.77)



High School 219 (16.60) 95 (15.18) 95 (16.90) 29 (22.14)



Secondary School 25 (1.90) 13 (2.08) 10 (1.78) 2 (1.53)



Primary School 6 (0.45) 4 (0.64) 1 (0.18) 1 (0.76)



Not declared 51 (3.87) 19 (3.04) 24 (4.27) 8 (6.11)


Place of Residence (%) < .001 .27


Town 156 (11.83) 92 (14.70) 49 (8.72) 15 (11.45)



Outskirts of town 327 (24.79) 185 (29.55) 116 (20.64) 26 (19.85)



Village 644 (48.82) 270 (43.13) 303 (53.91) 71 (54.20)



Countryside 192 (14.56) 79 (12.62) 94 (16.73) 19 (14.50)


Income in CHF (%) .25 .11


< 2500 68 (5.16) 29 (4.63) 35 (6.23) 4 (3.05)



2501–5000 203 (15.39) 90 (14.38) 91 (16.19) 22 (16.79)



5001–7500 418 (31.69) 204 (32.59) 176 (31.32) 38 (29.01)



7501–10,000 220 (16.68) 107 (17.09) 87 (15.48) 26 (19.85)



>10,000 137 (10.39) 78 (12.46) 50 (8.90) 9 (6.87)



Not declared 273 (20.70) 118 (18.85) 123 (21.89) 32 (24.43)


Nationality (%) .03 .13


Swiss 1195 (90.60) 554 (88.50) 520 (92.53) 121 (92.37)



German 56 (4.25) 36 (5.75) 17 (3.02) 3 (2.29)



Other 54 (4.09) 32 (5.11) 16 (2.85) 6 (4.58)



Not declared 14 (1.06) 4 (0.64) 9 (1.60) 1 (0.76)

Physical activity measures

Self-reported moderate to vigorous physical activitye (hours/week) < .001 .03


Mean (SD) 8.90 (11.10) 8.96 (11.38) 8.75 (10.59) 9.26 (11.25)



Median 6.00 6.00 6.00 5.25


Self-reported walkinge (hours/week) <.001 .03


Mean (SD) 10.01 (13.70) 10.31 (13.44) 9.99 (15.55) 8.61 (10.87)



Median 6.00 6.54 6.00 4.50


Physical activity at work 3.45 (1.88) 3.37 (1.84) 3.48 (1.91) 3.67 (1.90) < .001 .009

Physical activity during spare time 5.26 (1.17) 5.36 (1.19) 5.19 (1.13) 5.09 (1.22) .06 .003

Walking on way to work (%)







Yes 234 (17.74) 126 (20.13) 87 (15.48) 21 (16.03) .10 .06


No 1085 (82.26) 500 (79.87) 475 (84.52) 110 (84.97)

Other

Subjective health status 3.60 (0.73) 3.66 (0.73) 3.55 (0.71) 3.53 (0.80) <.001 .02

Pedometer brand (%)



.73 .09


Fitbit 832 (62.08) 387 (61.82) 359 (63.88) 86 (65.65)



Fitbit App 284 (21.53) 141 (22.52) 121 (21.53) 22 (16.79)



Garmin 138 (10.46) 69 (11.02) 55 (9.79) 14 (10.69)



Jawbone 65 (4.93) 29 (4.63) 27 (4.80) 9 (6.87)


Pedometer bought for participation (%) .04 .07


Yes 709 (53.75) 316 (50.48) 325 (57.83) 68 (51.91)



No 571 (43.29) 289 (46.17) 221 (39.32) 61 (46.56)



Not declared 39 (2.96) 21 (3.35) 16 (2.85) 2 (1.53)


Participation of family member or friend .65 .03


Yes 251 (19.03) 122 (19.49) 108 (19.22) 21 (16.03)



No 1068 (80.97) 504 (80.51) 454 (80.78) 110 (83.97)

a Unless otherwise indicated, mean (SD) are displayed for continuous variables and absolute frequencies (relative frequencies) are displayed for categorical variables.

b η2 is used as a measurement of effect size for one-way ANOVAs and Cramer’s V is used as a measurement of effect size for chi-square test. Effect size conventions for η2 are: .01 (small effect), .09 (medium effect), .25 (large effect). Effect size conventions for Cramver’s V are: .10 (small effect), .30 (medium effect), .50 (large effect) for df=1 and .07 (small effect), .21 (medium effect), .35 (large effect) for df=2 [77].

c Based on information of the Swiss Federal Office for Statistics for the year 2013 [78].

dCategories with expected frequencies <5 were not considered for between-group comparison.

e Due to violation of normality a logarithmic transformation was applied for between-group comparison and the median is reported in addition to the mean.