Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 23;31(10):1641–1646. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw238

Table 3.

Proportion of subjects with AKI based on clinical adjudication (CAC) versus the KDIGO AKI consensus criteria

KDIGO
(−) (+) Total Agreement
CAC
 No AKI (1/3 or 0/3) 330 (80.9%) 7 (1.7%) 337 (82.6%) 97.9%
 AKI (2/3 or 3/3) 6 (1.5%) 65 (15.9%) 71 (17.4%) 91.5%
 Total 336 (82.4%) 72 (17.6%) 408 (100%) 96.8%

For the purposes of this study, those with KDIGO Stage 1 AKI were not considered to have AKI. Agreement was present if the clinical adjudication committee adjudicated that AKI was not present and the maximum KDIGO stage was 0 or 1 or if the clinical adjudication committee adjudicated that AKI was present and the maximum KDIGO stage was 2 or 3.