Table 10.

Comparison of prediction performance between our proposed method and other seven methods on the yeast dataset

Method	AUROC				AUPRC
	CV	C1	C2	C3	CV	C1	C2	C3
MMI+NMBAC	0.82 ±0.02	0.82 ±0.01	0.62 ±0.02	0.61 ±0.02	0.84 ±0.01	0.84 ±0.01	0.64 ±0.02	0.62 ±0.02
MMI	0.82 ±0.01	0.82 ±0.01	0.62 ±0.02	0.60 ±0.02	0.84 ±0.02	0.84 ±0.01	0.64 ±0.02	0.61 ±0.02
NMBAC	0.82 ±0.01	0.82 ±0.01	0.61 ±0.02	0.60 ±0.03	0.83 ±0.01	0.83 ±0.01	0.63 ±0.03	0.60 ±0.03
M1	0.82 ±0.01	0.82 ±0.01	0.61 ±0.02	0.58 ±0.03	0.83 ±0.02	0.83 ±0.01	0.62 ±0.02	0.57 ±0.03
M2	0.83 ±0.01	0.84 ±0.01	0.60 ±0.02	0.59 ±0.03	0.84 ±0.02	0.84 ±0.01	0.61 ±0.02	0.58 ±0.03
M3	0.61 ±0.01	0.61 ±0.01	0.53 ±0.01	0.50 ±0.01	0.65 ±0.02	0.65 ±0.02	0.56 ±0.03	0.53 ±0.07
M4	0.76 ±0.02	0.76 ±0.02	0.57 ±0.02	0.54 ±0.03	0.76 ±0.02	0.76 ±0.02	0.58 ±0.02	0.54 ±0.03
M5	0.80 ±0.02	0.80 ±0.01	0.58 ±0.01	0.55 ±0.02	0.78 ±0.02	0.78 ±0.01	0.57 ±0.02	0.54 ±0.02
M6	0.75 ±0.02	0.75 ±0.02	0.59 ±0.04	0.52 ±0.04	0.75 ±0.02	0.76 ±0.02	0.60 ±0.05	0.47 ±0.07
M7	0.58 ±0.02	0.58 ±0.01	0.54 ±0.02	0.52 ±0.03	0.60 ±0.02	0.60 ±0.02	0.55 ±0.02	0.53 ±0.02