Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 27;17:398. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1253-9

Table 12.

Comparison of prediction performance between our proposed method and other seven methods on new yeast dataset, suppressing representation bias-driven learning

Method AUROC AUPRC
CV C1 C2 C3 CV C1 C2 C3
MMI+NMBAC 0.65 ±0.02 0.66 ±0.02 0.60 ±0.02 0.55 ±0.02 0.67 ±0.02 0.68 ±0.02 0.60 ±0.02 0.55 ±0.02
MMI 0.64 ±0.02 0.65 ±0.01 0.60 ±0.02 0.55 ±0.02 0.66 ±0.02 0.68 ±0.01 0.60 ±0.02 0.54 ±0.02
NMBAC 0.63 ±0.02 0.64 ±0.02 0.59 ±0.02 0.54 ±0.03 0.65 ±0.02 0.66 ±0.02 0.59 ±0.02 0.54 ±0.02
M1 0.64 ±0.01 0.64 ±0.01 0.62 ±0.02 0.57 ±0.04 0.65 ±0.01 0.65 ±0.01 0.61 ±0.02 0.56 ±0.03
M2 0.61 ±0.01 0.61 ±0.02 0.62 ±0.02 0.58 ±0.03 0.61 ±0.01 0.61 ±0.02 0.62 ±0.02 0.57 ±0.03
M3 0.54 ±0.01 0.55 ±0.01 0.53 ±0.01 0.50 ±0.01 0.60 ±0.02 0.60 ±0.01 0.56 ±0.03 0.53 ±0.07
M4 0.55 ±0.02 0.55 ±0.02 0.54 ±0.02 0.51 ±0.02 0.53 ±0.02 0.53 ±0.01 0.53 ±0.02 0.51 ±0.02
M5 0.60 ±0.02 0.60 ±0.01 0.55 ±0.02 0.52 ±0.02 0.61 ±0.02 0.61 ±0.01 0.55 ±0.02 0.51 ±0.02
M7 0.55 ±0.02 0.54 ±0.01 0.54 ±0.02 0.53 ±0.03 0.55 ±0.02 0.55 ±0.01 0.54 ±0.02 0.53 ±0.02