Table 12.
Comparison of prediction performance between our proposed method and other seven methods on new yeast dataset, suppressing representation bias-driven learning
| Method | AUROC | AUPRC | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | C1 | C2 | C3 | CV | C1 | C2 | C3 | |
| MMI+NMBAC | 0.65 ±0.02 | 0.66 ±0.02 | 0.60 ±0.02 | 0.55 ±0.02 | 0.67 ±0.02 | 0.68 ±0.02 | 0.60 ±0.02 | 0.55 ±0.02 |
| MMI | 0.64 ±0.02 | 0.65 ±0.01 | 0.60 ±0.02 | 0.55 ±0.02 | 0.66 ±0.02 | 0.68 ±0.01 | 0.60 ±0.02 | 0.54 ±0.02 |
| NMBAC | 0.63 ±0.02 | 0.64 ±0.02 | 0.59 ±0.02 | 0.54 ±0.03 | 0.65 ±0.02 | 0.66 ±0.02 | 0.59 ±0.02 | 0.54 ±0.02 |
| M1 | 0.64 ±0.01 | 0.64 ±0.01 | 0.62 ±0.02 | 0.57 ±0.04 | 0.65 ±0.01 | 0.65 ±0.01 | 0.61 ±0.02 | 0.56 ±0.03 |
| M2 | 0.61 ±0.01 | 0.61 ±0.02 | 0.62 ±0.02 | 0.58 ±0.03 | 0.61 ±0.01 | 0.61 ±0.02 | 0.62 ±0.02 | 0.57 ±0.03 |
| M3 | 0.54 ±0.01 | 0.55 ±0.01 | 0.53 ±0.01 | 0.50 ±0.01 | 0.60 ±0.02 | 0.60 ±0.01 | 0.56 ±0.03 | 0.53 ±0.07 |
| M4 | 0.55 ±0.02 | 0.55 ±0.02 | 0.54 ±0.02 | 0.51 ±0.02 | 0.53 ±0.02 | 0.53 ±0.01 | 0.53 ±0.02 | 0.51 ±0.02 |
| M5 | 0.60 ±0.02 | 0.60 ±0.01 | 0.55 ±0.02 | 0.52 ±0.02 | 0.61 ±0.02 | 0.61 ±0.01 | 0.55 ±0.02 | 0.51 ±0.02 |
| M7 | 0.55 ±0.02 | 0.54 ±0.01 | 0.54 ±0.02 | 0.53 ±0.03 | 0.55 ±0.02 | 0.55 ±0.01 | 0.54 ±0.02 | 0.53 ±0.02 |