Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 27;17:398. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1253-9

Table 4.

Analyze the performance of MMI and NMBAC on S.cerevisiae dataset by RF Classifier

Feature ACC(%) SN(%) Spec(%) PPV(%) NPV(%) F1(%) MCC(%)
MMI 94.23 ±0.36 91.01 ±0.45 97.44 ±0.40 97.27 ±0.38 91.55 ±0.48 94.03 ±0.35 88.63 ±0.71
NMBAC 92.76 ±0.35 90.99 ±0.59 94.53 ±0.50 94.34 ±0.37 91.30 ±0.68 92.63 ±0.26 85.57 ±0.70
MMI+NMBAC(A-B order) 95.01 ±0.46 92.67 ±0.50 97.31 ±0.61 97.16 ±0.55 93.06 ±0.48 94.26 ±1.18 90.10 ±0.92
MMI+NMBAC(B-A order) 94.90 ±0.24 92.60 ±0.47 97.22 ±0.58 97.10 ±0.44 92.89 ±0.55 94.79 ±0.78 89.91 ±1.1