Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 17;32(19):2936–2946. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw361

Table 1.

Comparison of different methods on the S2648 dataset

Method All mutations
Common mutations
P-valued
na γb σc na γb σc
I-Mutent3.0 2636 0.60 1.19 2484 0.60 1.19 7.2E-28
INPS 2648 0.56 1.26 2484 0.56 1.26 5.3E-46
mCSM 2643 0.69 1.07 2484 0.70 1.07 1.4E-18
PoPMuSiC 2647 0.61 1.17 2484 0.61 1.17 1.6E-25
STRUM 2647 0.77 0.94 2484 0.78 0.92

an, number of mutations obtained from the programs.

aγ, PCC between predicted and experiment ΔΔG.

aσ, RMSE of ΔΔG prediction in Kcal/mol.

aP-value, P-value in Wilcoxon test between the RMSE of STRUM and that by the control methods on the common mutations.