Table 3.
The comparison of FD between two human observers and different vessel segmentation methods by considering Observer 1 as reference.
| Method | Box dimension (D B) | Information dimension (D I) | Correlation dimension (D C) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Max∗ | MRE† | p value‡ | Max | MRE | p value | Max | MRE | p value | |
| Observer 2 | 7.1% | 2.0% | 0.0585 | 6.7% | 1.9% | 0.0851 | 6.2% | 1.8% | 0.0974 |
| Frangi [18] | 9.3% | 4.3% | 0.8035 | 9.4% | 4.3% | 0.8802 | 9.4% | 4.3% | 0.6990 |
| Soares [19] | 8.7% | 2.9% | 0.4926 | 8.7% | 3.0% | 0.7339 | 8.9% | 3.0% | 0.8657 |
| Zhang [20] | 7.4% | 3.9% | 0.4950 | 7.4% | 3.8% | 0.8506 | 7.3% | 3.8% | 0.691 |
∗Max: maximum relative error with respect to Observer 1.
†MRE: mean of relative error with respect to Observer 1.
‡Pearson correlation test with null hypothesis that the correlation coefficient is zero.