Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 28;11(9):e0163755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163755

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the included studies: pre-RFCA vs. post-RFCA.

Source (Year) Study design Type of AF Prior treatment with AAD Mean duration of AF (year) Procedure type Successful ablation of AF Follow up measurement of SF-36 (month) Number of patients Age (Year) Mean LA diameter (mm) Major exclusion criteria
Tada et al. (2003) Observational study Paroxysmal Y 6.5 ± 6.8 SPVI 56% 6 50 58 ± 7 40 ± 7 NR
Pürerfellner et al. (2004) Observational study Paroxysmal Y 6.3 ± 5.4 SPVI 89.3% 6 61 52.6 ± 10.8 42 ± 6 Significant underlying heart disease
Cha et al. (2008) Observational study Paroxysmal (52%), Persistent or Permanent (42%) Y 6.4 ± 5.9 CPVI (57%), WACA (42%) 83.6% 12 432 54 ± 10 NR NR
Carnlöf et al. (2010) Observational study Paroxysmal, Persistent Y NR PVI NR 6 34 53 ± 9 NR NR
Wokhlu et al. (2010) Observational study Paroxysmal (51%), Persistent (35%), Long-standing (13%) Y 6.6 ± 5.9 CPVI (22%), WACA (78%) 87% 24 323 55.9 ± 10.3 NR NR
Reynolds et al. (2010) Observational study* Paroxysmal Y 3 (2–8) CPVI + Linear ablation, CFAE ablation, Cavotricuspid isthmus ablation (based on operator’s decision) 66% 3 97 55.5 ± 9.4 40.0 ± 1.1 Ejection fraction of less than 40%, previous ablation for AF, myocardial infarction within the previous 2 months, severe pulmonary disease
Pappone et al. (2011) Observational study* Paroxysmal Y 6 ± 4 CPVA + Cavotricuspid isthmus ablation 72.7% 48 99 55 ± 10 40 ± 6 Persistent AF, Left atrial diameter > 65 mm, LVEF < 35%, heart failure symptoms
Höglund et al. (2013) Observational study Paroxysmal (50%), Persistent (48%), Long-standing (2%) Y NR SPVI (34%), wide antral circumferential isolation (41%), isolation with the multi-polar catheter (25%) 62% 10 105 58 ± 9 44 ± 7 NR
Mantovan et al. (2013) Observational study* Paroxysmal (64%), Persistent (36%) Y 7 ± 7 WACA (32%), WACA + CFAE (34%), CFAE (34%) 63.0% 12 100 57 ± 10 42 ± 6 Patients with permanent atrial fibrillation, patients who have previously undergone atrial fibrillation ablation, patients with left atrial size >55 mm
Sang et al. (2013) Observational study Parosyxmal Y 7.5 ± 7.5 CPVI, Cavotricuspid isthmus ablation (if atrial flutter was documented) 72% 12 82 55.9 ± 6.1 39.0 ± 5.9 Previous nonpharmacological interventions for AF, New York Heart Association functional class III or IV, myocardial infarction, cardiac surgery or transient ischemic attack/stroke within the previous 6 months
Efremidis et al. (2014) Observational study Parosyxmal Y 4.9 ± 4.7 WACA 71.9% 6 57 56.9 ± 12.2 40.4 ± 4.7 Left atrial diameter >50 mm, systolic heart failure, persistent AF
Natale et al. (2014) Observational study* Parosyxmal Y 4.0 (1.4–7.1) CPVI + Linear ablation, CFAE ablation, Cavotricuspid isthmus ablation (based on operator’s decision) 74.0% 12 117 58.3 ± 10.9 38.5 ± 5.6 AF of more than 30 days in duration, ejection fraction <40%, previous AF ablation, New York Heart Association functional class III or class IV, severe pulmonary disease
Wynn et al. (2015) Observational study* Paroxysmal (39%), Persistent (61%) Y 5.5 ± 4.0 WACA (49%), WACA + linear ablation (51%) 64.8% 12 122 61.9 ± 10.5 43 ± 6 Long-standing (>12 months) persistent AF, previous AF ablation, documented typical atrial flutter

*: These studies were originally randomized clinical trials. However, since we used pre and post data of only RFCA arm, we classified these studies as observational studies.

AAD: antiarrhythmic drugs; AF: atrial fibrillation; CFAE: complex fractionated atrial electrogram; CPVA: circumferential pulmonary vein ablation; CPVI: circumferential pulmonary vein isolation; LA: left atrium; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; NR: not reported; PVI: pulmonary vein isolation; RFCA: radiofrequency catheter ablation; SF-36: short form-36; SPVI: segmental pulmonary vein isolation; WACA: wide area catheter ablation.