Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Sep 28;23(2):482–489. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4876-6

Table 3.

Multivariate Analysis of Associations Between Grade, Comedonecrosis, Multicentricity with Mammographic Features and ER Status in 1657 Patients with Pure DCIS

Feature Grade 3 (N=854) Comedonecrosis (N=855) Multicentricity (N=663)
Odds Ratio (95% CI) p value Odds Ratio (95% CI) p value Odds Ratio (95% CI) p value
Breast density Fatty/scattered 1 (−) - 1 (−) - 1 (−) -
Heterogeneously dense 1.2 (0.8–1.6) 0.37 1.1 (0.8–1.5) 0.57 1.1 (0.6–1.8) 0.80
Extremely dense 1.0 (0.5–1.9) 0.98 0.9 (0.5–1.6) 0.62 3.1 (1.3–7.0) <0.01
Microcalcification morphology Punctate/amorphous 1 (−) - 1 (−) - 1 (−) -
Coarse heterogeneous/fine pleomorphic 2.3 (1.5–3.3) <0.0001 1.4 (1.0–2.0) 0.08 1.4 (0.8–2.6) 0.25
Fine linear (branching) 3.4 (1.9–6.1) <0.0001 1.7 (1.0– 2.9) <0.05 0.7 (0.3–1.7) 0.44
Microcalcification distribution Clustered/grouped 1 (−) - 1 (−) - 1 (−) -
Linear/segmental 1.3 (0.8–1.9) 0.27 1.6 (1.1–2.4) <0.02 0.9 (0.5–1.8) 0.83
Regional/diffuse 1.0 (0.6–1.7) 0.97 1.4 (0.8–2.2) 0.21 1.6 (0.8–3.1) 0.15
Mammographic size 1.1 (1.0–1.2) 0.02 1.2 (1.1–1.3) <0.0001 1.4 (1.3–1.5) <0.0001
ER-negative status 30.8 (12.4–76.6) <0.0001 3.2 (2.1–4.7) <0.0001 1.4 (0.8–2.4) 0.21

Note: Multiple logistic regression analysis was implemented using the set of independent variables (breast density, microcalcification morphology, microcalcification distribution, mammographic size, ER-negative status) for each dependent variable (grade 3, comedonecrosis, and multicentricity). P values for the partial odds ratios derive from the two-sided Wald test. For categorical predictors with three factor levels, the partial odds ratio for observing the dependent variable is provided in relation to the reference category indicated by 1 (−). For mammographic size, the partial odds ratio is provided per unit increase in cm.