Table 1.
Intervention Strategies | |||
---|---|---|---|
Strategies | HEAL | ICAS | NCICAS |
Staff | AC: Master’s level Diverse backgrounds CHW: Developed rapport with family, established community partnerships Scheduled visits Assisted AC with environmental education intervention |
EC: Environmental Peer Counselor Environmental Interventionist: Performed remediation activities, visit scheduling |
AC: Master’s level Social Worker Clinic staff: Assisted with watching children who came to clinic visit with caregiver |
Training | 2 day initial central training+ ongoing Investigator shadowing Individual ongoing follow-up |
4 day initial central training with field practice plus 1.5 day central training after study start | Over 3 months 3, 2.5 day sessions 2 wk. clinic observation |
Staff Evaluation | 1,3,6,9, 12 months evaluation and verbal testing | Yearly site visits with feedback | 2 site visits per year with feedback |
Environmental Intervention and Supplies | All: Safe sleeping zone, mold and ETS exposure, dust mite covers, cleaning supplies (e.g, dust mops, spray bottles) food storage containers, hypoallergenic bed covers, HEPA unit Tailored: ERAT-recommended Modules-cockroach, rodent, pets, mold, ETS; Focused on doable goals in stressed environment Supplies - HEPA air purifier with filter, dust mop, food storage containers, spray bottles, hypoallergenic bed covers |
All: Safe sleeping zone, dust mite covers, HEPA vacuum, washable blanket, cleaning supplies Tailored a: ERAT-recommended Modules-cockroach, pets, rodent, mold, ETS Supplies - food storage containers, mouse traps, HEPA unit Exterminator for children sensitive and exposed to cockroach |
All: Dust mite covers Pet & ETS exposure Tailored: AC discussions tailored by responses to CARAT Supplies –referrals to community resources for smoking, psychological, and social issues 2 exterminator visits for children sensitive to cockroach |
Maximum Caseload | 40 at start, 60 midway | 60–75 | 60 families |
Provider Contact | Communicated with medical providers as needed | NA | NA |
Intervention Activities | |||
HEAL | ICAS | NCICAS | |
Participant Characteristics | |||
Location | Greater New Orleans, LA | 7 US inner cities | 8 US inner cities |
Study Design | Pre-Post Intervention | Randomized control | Randomized control |
No. of Participants | 182 | 937 (469 intervention) | 1033 (515 intervention) |
Age of Participants | 4 – 12 years old | 5 – 11 years old | 5 – 9 years old |
Allergens tested b | 23, including 16 molds | 14, including 4 molds | 9, including 4 molds |
Intervention Characteristics | |||
Intervention Period | 1 year | 1 year | 1 year |
Intervention Frequency | 2 group sessionsd, 2 visitsc (1 home), 2 follow-up calls | No group sessions, 5 home visits plus 2 optional visitsc, each followed by telephone calls | 2 group sessions with caretaker and 2 with child, 6 clinic visits with AC alternating with 6 telephone callsc |
CARAT | Yes | No | Yes |
ERAT | Yes | Yes | No |
Outcome Collection Intervals | |||
Home Environmental Assessments | Baseline, 6, and 12 months | Baseline, 6, and 12 months | None |
Clinical Outcomes | Every 3 months | Every 2 months | Every 2 months |
Supplies were distributed based on sensitivity and remediation/education refined based on sensitivity and exposure.
ICAS and NCICAS participants had to be sensitive to >1 allergen; HEAL did not require participants to be sensitized.
The frequency varied according to the needs of the participant.
Group sessions dropped