Table 2.
Advantages | Limitations |
---|---|
Prevents stretching and failure of the grafts in cases of concomitant chronic PLC or ACL instabilities and varus malalignment | Risk of tibial fracture |
Possibility to perform a biplanar correction, which can be adjusted according to the instability | Need for an 8-week period of nonweightbearing |
In some patients, the correction of varus malalignment reduces the instability complaint | Risk of consolidation problems is higher in opening osteotomies, when compared with lateral closing osteotomies. |
Opening wedge osteotomies allow for better control of the correction | Big corrections may be better addressed with a distraction opening technique or double osteotomy |
For treatment of early degenerative disease of the medial compartment, proximal tibial osteotomy can delay the need for a joint replacement procedure. | Big changes in bony anatomy can challenge future conversion to a knee replacement |
ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; PLC, posterolateral corner.