Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 21;43(5):430–437. doi: 10.5999/aps.2016.43.5.430

Fig. 4. Comparison of 3D-scanning and MRI-volumetry.

Fig. 4

In the Bland-Altman analysis (A), most values lie within the 95% confidence interval and the relationship between the 3D scanning and the water-displacement technique was shown to vary depending on the volume. Using Passing-Bablok regression, the following regression analysis was derived: 3D scan=64.86+(0.47×MRI) (B). We were able to find a linear association and significant difference between the two methods. MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; SD, standard deviation.