Table 4.
Total PA (95% CI) stratified by the level of executive function with GDS and intensity for CDR categories
| Total PA by CDR |
p for trend | Effect of education |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDR 0 | CDR 0.5 | CDR 1+ | F | p | ||
| Total PA in simple executive function | ||||||
| Light PA with low GDS | 2.19 (2.10–2.27) | 2.21 (2.13–2.29) | 1.50 (1.30–1.69)a, b | 0.000 | 1.25 | 0.264 |
| Light PA with high GDS | 2.36 (2.18–2.53) | 2.26 (2.14–2.39) | 1.54 (1.33–1.75)a, b | 0.000 | 3.04 | 0.083 |
| High PA with low GDS | 0.90 (o. 69–1.11) | 1.01 (o. 82–1.21) | 0.83 (0.34–1.32) | 0.806 | 0.29 | 0.589 |
| High PA with high GDS | 0.67 (0.35–0.99) | 0.73 (0.50–0.96) | 0.29 (0.10–0.68) | 0.151 | 0.00 | 0.953 |
| Total PA in complicated executive function | ||||||
| Light PA with low GDS | 4.68 (4.50–4.87) | 4.30 (4.13–4.46)a | 2.35 (1.92–2.78)a, b | 0.000 | 0.17 | 0.678 |
| Light PA with high GDS | 4.44 (4.08–4.81) | 3.88 (3.62–4.15)a | 2.00 (1.56–2.45)a, b | 0.000 | 0.42 | 0.518 |
| High PA with low GDS | 2.07 (l. 83–2.3l) | 1.55 (1.33–1.76)a | 0.74 (0.19–1.30)a, b | 0.000 | 2.08 | 0.151 |
| High PA with high GDS | 2.19 (l. 78–2.61) | 1.13 (0.83–1.42)a | 0.65 (0.14–1.15)a | 0.000 | 0.04 | 0.838 |
Low GDS: <5, high GDS: ≥6; PA was calculated by METs × h/day. Statistical analysis: ANOVA (Bonferroni test) adjusted for sex, age, education, and GDS.
a
Significant difference with CDR 0 (p < 0.05).
b
Significant difference with CDR 0.5 (p < 0.05).