Table 1.
Multilevel SEMs on the influence of fairness preferences and personality on FN amplitude differences between fairness conditions of proposers (mixed, fair and unfair)
| Model 1: negative reciprocity | Model 2: prosociality | Model 3: assertiveness | Model 4: HH | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Level 1 | ||||
| Intercept | −1.43 (0.18) | −1.43 (0.18) | −1.43 (0.18) | −1.43 (0.18) |
| C1 (mixed vs unfair & fair) | 0.31* (0.06) | 0.31* (0.06) | 0.31* (0.06) | 0.31* (0.06) |
| C2 (unfair vs fair) | −0.04 (0.07) | −0.04 (0.07) | −0.04 (0.07) | −0.04 (0.07) |
| Level 2 | ||||
| Variances | ||||
| Intercept | 6.07 (.62) | 5.96 (.62) | 6.06 (.62) | 6.07 (.62) |
| C1 | 0.02 (0.06) | 0.03 (0.06) | 0.05 (0.06) | 0.07 (0.07) |
| C2 | 0.20 (0.10) | 0.20 (0.10) | .19 (0.10) | 0.19 (0.10) |
| Predictor (γ parameters) | ||||
| Intercept | 0.13 (.55) | −.79 (.51) | −0.22 (.46) | −0.05 (.37) |
| C1 | 0.34* (0.17) | −0.03 (0.15) | 0.17 (0.15) | −0.05 (0.12) |
| C2 | 0.12 (0.21) | −0.03 (0.19 | 0.10 (0.18) | −0.15 (0.15) |
| Fit statistics | ||||
| df | 19 | 22 | 19 | 22 |
| AIC | 343 167 | 346 310 | 344 136 | 345 458 |
df, number of free parameters.
*p < 0.05; SEs are depicted in parenthesis.