Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 1;4(3):48. doi: 10.3390/healthcare4030048

Table 4.

ANOVA results comparing groups attended by cancer patients (N = 296) for group experience questionnaire subscale percentile ranks (across groups).

Mean Percentile Rank of Subscale Therapist-Led Non-Therapist-Led p Value, d
Stanford SET TWC/CSC
(n = 20) (n = 228) (n = 48)
Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
Expressing True Feelings 59.56 (29.24) 53.49 (27.51) 30.54 (26.50) 0.001
SET vs. TWC/CSC 0.64 a, 00.21
SET vs. NTL 0.001 b, 1.04
TWC/CSC vs. NTL 0.001 c, 0.85
Discussing Sexual Concerns 79.77 (19.81) 51.98 (26.10) 30.06 (26.55) 0.001
SET vs. TWC/CSC 0.001 a, 1.20
SET vs. NTL 0.001 b, 2.12
TWC/CSC vs. NTL 0.001 c, 0.83
Developing a New Attitude 38.66 (27.79) 53.61 (27.75) 38.62 (30.35) 0.001
SET vs. TWC/CSC 0.08 a, 0.65
SET vs. NTL 0.94 b, 0.09
TWC/CSC vs. NTL 0.02 c, 0.49
Accessing Resources and Advice 45.19 (28.72) 52.10 (28.10) 43.09 (30.20) 0.10
Establishing Supportive Contact 50.97 (24.89) 50.75 (28.70) 47.15 (31.55) 0.73

Note: Significance tests were two-tailed. Study variables are subscales of the Group Experience Questionnaire (GEQ). We used Sheffe post-hoc tests to adjust for multiple comparisons. a: SET vs. TWC/CSC; b: SET vs. Non-Therapist-Led (NTL); c: TWC/CSC vs. NTL; d: Cohen’s d effect size.