Table 1.
Students’ feedback on the workshop.
| Themes |
|
Examples |
| Supportive comments (N=56) |
|
|
|
|
General comments | “Very informative. Made me think about my decisions. Really interesting and provocative. I think this is definitely something to be addressed with our generation. I really enjoyed it—eye opening.” |
|
|
Group discussion | “Wonderful discussion. Loved the ethical dilemmas addressed. Love the crowd sourcing and collaboration.” |
| “It was useful to have a discussion, since I personally had not thought about these issues before.” | ||
|
|
Small group interactions | “I enjoyed the interactive nature of the activities. It made a topic that many might have slept through (esp. with late in afternoon timing), quite exciting.” |
|
|
Case-based format | “This was fun and a good was to meet the people in my group! I felt the review of questionable cases was helpful.” |
| Constructively critical comments (N=54) |
|
|
|
|
Timing | “Maybe shorten the session a little bit. Keep the interactive part.” |
|
|
“I wish we had more time for the discussion at the end of the session.” | |
|
|
Format | “I would have liked it better if you had examples already for us. Not sure ours was the greatest.” |
|
|
“It would have been nice to have some of the resources we found today available to us—possibly via email.” | |
|
|
“Instructions at the beginning were not exactly clear.” | |
|
|
Content | “Would have liked to be given more specific info regarding policy. I think it could be improved if we talked more about those “blurry” boundaries and how to negotiate with these issues” |