Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 29;14:73. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0144-x

Table 2.

Overall course evaluations, median score (range)

Feedback (ordered from highest-to-lowest score) End of coursea 1-year follow-upa
How much did this DHS training improve your …
 Understanding of results from statistical analysis 4 (2–4) 4 (2–4)
 Ability to complete analysis which could contribute to a publication 4 (1–4) 4 (2–4)
 Generation of ideas of future research 4 (3–4) 3.5 (2–4)
 Ability to use Stata for analysis 4 (2–4) 3.5 (2–4)
 Ability to explain analysis to others 4 (2–4) 3.5 (2–4)
 Ability to complete logistic regression 4 (2–4) 3.5 (1–4)
 Ability to communicate about data and research 4 (1–4) 3.5 (2–4)
 Ability to complete data analysis in complex survey data 4 (3–4) 3 (2–4)
 Network with other colleagues in Rwanda 4 (3–4) 3 (2–4)
 Establishment of future research collaborations 4 (3–4) 3 (2–4)
 Identification of resources for future research 3.5 (2–4) 3 (1–4)
 Use of data to support program management/policy 3.5 (1–4) 3 (1–4)
 Ability to build a statistical model 3 (2–4) 3 (1–4)
How useful were the following materials/activities?
 Hand-out of slides with text (no room for notes) 4 (3–4) 3 (2–4)
 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) pre-downloaded datasets 4 (1–4) 3 (2–4)
 Hand-out of slides with room for notes (no additional text) 4 (3–4) 3 (1–4)
 Example .do files 4 (2–4) 3 (1–4)
 Stata 4 (2–4) 3 (1–4)
 Practice exercises (standardized across all groups) 4 (2–4) 3 (1–4)
 Binders of materials 4 (1–4) 3 (1–4)
 Materials on USB drives 4 (1–4) 3 (1–4)
 EdX videos on Stata 3 (2–4) 3 (1–3)
 Practice exercises (group specific) 4 (2–4) 2.5 (1–4)
 Pre-training readings on DHS 4 (2–4) 2.5 (1–4)
 Pre-training readings on topics 4 (2–4) 2.5 (1–4)
 Example DHS methods write-up 4 (2–4) 2.5 (1–4)
N 16 14

aScores: 1 – not at all, 2 – a little, 3 – quite a bit, 4 – very much