Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cancer. 2016 Aug 9;139(10):2221–2231. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30287

Table 2. Hazard ratios* (HRs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between diet patterns and cancer mortality.

Dietary pattern Quartile of dietary pattern
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 p Valuetrend*
Convenience Events 255 226 213 179
Crude 0.87 (0.72–1.04) 0.80 (0.67–0.96) 0.66 (0.54–0.79) <0.001
Model 1 0.99 (0.83–1.19) 0.95 (0.79–1.15) 0.87 (0.71–1.07) 0.5
Model 2 0.97 (0.80–1.16) 0.93 (0.76–1.12) 0.83 (0.68–1.02) 0.4
Model 3 0.90 (0.74–1.10) 0.94 (0.77–1.14) 0.79 (0.64–0.98) 0.2
Plant based Events 256 220 211 186
Crude 0.86 (0.72–1.03) 0.81 (0.68–0.98) 0.72 (0.59–0.86) 0.005
Model 1 0.75 (0.63–0.90) 0.72 (0.60–0.87) 0.65 (0.53–0.79) <0.001
Model 2 0.83 (0.69–1.00) 0.86 (0.71–1.04) 0.82 (0.67–1.01) 0.2
Model 3 0.81 (0.66–0.98) 0.88 (0.72–1.08) 0.80 (0.65–0.99) 0.03
Sweets/fats Events 206 215 227 225
Crude 1.04 (0.86–1.26) 1.09 (0.91–1.32) 1.11 (0.92–1.34) 0.7
Model 1 0.95 (0.79–1.15) 0.97 (0.80–1.17) 0.98 (0.81–1.18) 1.0
Model 2 1.01 (0.83–1.24) 1.00 (0.82–1.22) 0.98 (0.80–1.20) 1.0
Model 3 0.99 (0.80–1.22) 0.99 (0.81–1.22) 0.97 (0.78–1.20) 1.0
Southern Events 146 200 242 285
Crude 1.40 (1.13–1.74) 1.73 (1.41–2.12) 2.10 (1.71–2.55) <0.001
Model 1 1.35 (1.09–1.68) 1.53 (1.23–1.89) 1.88 (1.51–2.35) 0.006
Model 2 1.29 (1.03–1.61) 1.46 (1.18–1.82) 1.67 (1.32–2.10) 0.03
Model 3 1.35 (1.07–1.70) 1.51 (1.20–1.90) 1.75 (1.38–2.23) <0.001
Alcohol/salads Events 206 232 239 196
Crude 1.12 (0.92–1.35) 1.14 (0.94–1.37) 0.91 (0.75–1.11) 0.08
Model 1 1.28 (1.06–1.54) 1.39 (1.15–1.69) 1.26 (1.03–1.55) 0.007
Model 2 1.23 (1.02–1.50) 1.22 (1.00–1.49) 1.01 (0.80–1.26) 0.05
Model 3 1.20 (0.98–1.47) 1.21 (0.98–1.49) 1.03 (0.82–1.30) 0.1

Bold indicates statistically significant at α ≤ 0.05 and α ≤ 0.10 for interaction.

There were 873 cancer deaths among 22,041 REGARDS participants.

Model 1 adjusted for sociodemographics (i.e., age, sex, race, education, income and region).

Model 2 is additionally adjusted for health behaviors (i.e., smoking status, alcohol use and physical activity).

Model 3 is additionally adjusted for chronic medical conditions (i.e., chronic lung disease, coronary artery disease, diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, myocardial infarction, obesity, peripheral artery disease and stroke).

*

Estimated using Cox proportional hazards model.

(–) Q1 is reference group.