Table 2A. Newcastle-Ottawa scale for assessment of quality of in included Cohort studies.
| Author | Quality assessment criteria | Overall QualityScore(max = 9) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selection | Comparability | Outcome | |||||||
| Representativeness of exposed cohort? | Selection of the non-exposed cohort? | Ascertainment of exposure? | Outcome of interest was not present at start of study? | Study control forage/gender and additional factor? | Assessment of outcome? | Was follow-up long enough for outcome to occur? | Adequacy of follow-up of cohorts? | ||
| Nimptsch et al. 2015 | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 9 |
| Simons et al. 2009 | - | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 8 |
| Yang et al. 2009 | - | * | * | * | ** | * | * | - | 7 |
| Wang et al. 2009 | - | * | * | * | ** | * | * | - | 7 |
| Akhter et al. 2008 | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 8 |
| Mursu et al. 2008 | - | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 7 |
| Butler et al. 2008 | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 9 |
| Oba et al. 2007 | * | * | - | * | * | * | * | * | 7 |
| Knekt et al. 2002 | * | * | - | * | * | * | * | - | 6 |
Each asterisk represents if individual criterion within the subsection were fulfilled.