Table 2A. Newcastle-Ottawa scale for assessment of quality of in included Cohort studies.
Author | Quality assessment criteria | Overall QualityScore(max = 9) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selection | Comparability | Outcome | |||||||
Representativeness of exposed cohort? | Selection of the non-exposed cohort? | Ascertainment of exposure? | Outcome of interest was not present at start of study? | Study control forage/gender and additional factor? | Assessment of outcome? | Was follow-up long enough for outcome to occur? | Adequacy of follow-up of cohorts? | ||
Nimptsch et al. 2015 | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 9 |
Simons et al. 2009 | - | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 8 |
Yang et al. 2009 | - | * | * | * | ** | * | * | - | 7 |
Wang et al. 2009 | - | * | * | * | ** | * | * | - | 7 |
Akhter et al. 2008 | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 8 |
Mursu et al. 2008 | - | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 7 |
Butler et al. 2008 | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 9 |
Oba et al. 2007 | * | * | - | * | * | * | * | * | 7 |
Knekt et al. 2002 | * | * | - | * | * | * | * | - | 6 |
Each asterisk represents if individual criterion within the subsection were fulfilled.