Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 9;7(18):26823–26836. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8662

Table 4. Multivariate analysis of DFS and OS for adenocacinoma patients harboring EGFR mutations.

Variable DFS OS
HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI) P-value
EGFR-mutated (n = 218)
Clinical Stage (I–II vs. IIIA) 1.825 (1.205–2.762) 0.004 1.694 (1.025–2.802) 0.040
CEA (> 5 ng/ml vs. ≤ 5 ng/ml)
Cyfra21–1 (> 3.3 ng/ml vs.≤ 3.3 ng/ml) 1.543 (1.039–2.292) 0.032 2.527 (1.620–3.942) < 0.001
Exon 19 deletion subgroup (n = 105)
Clinical Stage (I–II vs. IIIA)
CEA (> 5 ng/ml vs. ≤ 5 ng/ml)
Cyfra21–1 (> 3.3 ng/ml vs.≤ 3.3 ng/ml) 2.713 (1.229–4.428) 0.002
L858R substitution subgroup (n = 113)
Clinical Stage (I–II vs. IIIA) 2.234 (1.246–4.004) 0.007
CEA (> 5 ng/ml vs. ≤ 5 ng/ml) 2.259 (1.277–3.996) 0.005 2.515 (1.313–4.819) 0.005
Cyfra21–1 (> 3.3 ng/ml vs.≤ 3.3 ng/ml) 2.068 (1.087–3.933) 0.027
EGFR wild-type (n = 348)
Clinical Stage (I–II vs. IIIA) 1.527 (1.070–2.181) 0.02 1.593 (1.058–2.398) 0.026
CEA (> 5 ng/ml vs. ≤ 5 ng/ml) 2.150 (1.606–2.878) < 0.001 1.711 (1.224–2.392) 0.002
Cyfra21–1 (> 3.3 ng/ml vs. ≤ 3.3 ng/ml)