Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 31;19(4):962–972. doi: 10.1111/hex.12391

Table 1.

Respondent characteristics and results of the known‐groups validity test of the PAIEC (n = 223)

n (%) AIEC overall score PAIEC subscales
Patient activation and contextual information Goal setting and problem solving Coordination and follow up
Median scores (inter‐quartile range)
Gendera
Female 153 (69%) 26 (20–44) 10 (7–18) 8 (7–14) 7 (6–12)
Male 70 (31%) 33 (22–49) 12 (7–19) 10 (7–16) 10 (6–14)b
Agea
≤82 126 (57%) 26 (20–44) 10 (7–17) 7 (7–14) 7 (6–13)
≥83 97 (43%) 33 (20–47) 12 (7–19) 10 (7–14) 8 (6–13)
Marital statusa
Married or long‐term relationship 109 (49%) 26 (20–44) 10 (7–16) 7 (7–14) 8 (6–13)
Widowed, divorced or single 114 (51%) 32 (21–46) 11 (7–19) 9 (7–14) 8 (6–13)
Educationc
Lowd 127 (57%) 28 (20–45) 10 (7–18) 9 (7–15) 8 (6–13)
Moderated 80 (36%) 32 (20–47) 12 (7–19) 9 (7–15) 9 (6–14)
Highd 16 (7%) 27 (20–35) 11 (7–16) 9 (7–11) 6 (6–10)
Intervention profilea
Frail 95 (43%) 28 (20–44) 10 (7–17) 7 (7–13) 8 (6–13)
Complex care needs 128 (57%) 30.5 (20–45.5) 11 (7–19) 10 (7–14.5) 8 (6–12.5)
Number of conditionsa
≤3 139 (62%) 24 (20–39) 9 (7–14) 7 (7–12) 7 (6–12)
≥4 84 (38%) 38 (25–49)e 15 (8–20)e 11 (7–16)b 11 (96–14)e
Number of medicinesa
≤3 62 (28%) 24 (20–37) 7.5 (7–14) 7 (7–11) 6 (6–10)
≥4 161 (72%) 32 (21–49)b 12 (7–19)b 10 (7–15)b 9 (7–13)b
Received home carea
No 169 (76%) 25 (20–40) 9 (7–15) 7 (7–12) 7 (6–12)
Yes 54 (24%) 44 (32–52)e 17 (11–21)e 13 (9–19)e 11 (6–14)b
a

Mann–Whitney test.

b

Kruskal–Wallis test.

c

Low: primary school, low vocational training or less; Moderate: secondary school or vocational training; High: higher professional education or university.

d

Small effect size ( 0.10 to <0.24).

e

Moderate effect size ( 0.24 to <0.37).