Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 31;42(7):845–854. doi: 10.1111/apt.13334

Table 3.

Adjusted change in RDQ score for the GERD dimension and the individual RDQ dimensions from baseline to the end of treatment (ITT population)

RDQ dimension LSM change (95% CI) LSM differencea
Gaviscon DA (n = 536) Placebo (n = 537) (95% CI); P‐valueb
GERD (heartburn + regurgitation) −1.27 (−1.37 to −1.16) −1.06 (−1.17 to −0.95) −0.21 (−0.31 to −0.11); P < 0.0001
Heartburn −1.16 (−1.28 to −1.04) −0.95 (−1.07 to −0.83) −0.21 (−0.32 to −0.10); P = 0.0001
Regurgitation −1.37 (−1.48 to −1.26) −1.16 (−1.27 to −1.05) −0.21 (−0.32 to −0.09); P = 0.0004
Dyspepsia −0.98 (−1.10 to −0.86) −0.80 (−0.91 to −0.68) −0.18 (−0.29 to −0.08); P = 0.0004

CI, confidence interval; GERD, gastroesophageal reflux disease; LSM, least‐squares mean; RDQ, reflux disease questionnaire; DA, Double Action; ITT, intent‐to‐treat.

a

LSM difference is the difference in RDQ score changes between treatment groups (LSM change for Gaviscon DA group minus LSM change for placebo group).

b

P‐value for comparison between treatment groups.