Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 29;3(2):75–84. doi: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2015.0085

Table 2.

Selected studies analyzing the effect of aPL on pregnancy morbidity in SLE patients

Study (Year) Study Design n aPL PM in aPL + SLE PM in aPL − SLE Odds Ratio 95% CI
Park et al. (2015) (57) Retrospective 50 aCL 53.8% 34.7% 2.2 0.6–7.6
2GPI 16.7% 9.1% 2 0.1–39.1
LA 25% 40.7% 0.5 0.1–2.6

Jakobsen et al. (2014) (58) Retrospective 39 aCL, aβ2GPI, or LA 43.5% 13.1% N/A N/A

Buyon et al. (2015) (60) Prospective 385 LA 55.9% 15.3% 8.3 3.6–19.3
aCL, aβ2GPI, or LA 43.8% 15.4% 4.3 2.2–8.1

Cortes Hernandes et al. (2002) (61) Prospective 60 aCL 72.5% 41.8% 3.7 1.5–8.8
2GPI 84.8% 38.7% 8.9 3–26.1
LA 70% 43.6% 3 1.3–7.1

aCL: anticardiolipin antibodies; aβ2GPI: anti-β2-glycoprotein-I antibodies; CI: confidence interval; LA: lupus anticoagulant; N: number of patients; N/A: not applicable; PM: pregnancy morbidity; aPL: antiphospholipid antibodies; SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus