Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 18;4(5):686–696. doi: 10.1177/2050640615623369

Table 1.

Characteristics of participants along the sampling procedure in the 2011/2012 survey

All Ages Women % (95% CI) Mean age (95% CI) Higher education % (95% CI) <80 Years of age Women % (95% CI) Mean age (95% CI) Higher education % (95% CI)
Study population 2011 1924 51.0 (48.8–53.3) 54.1a (53.3–54.9) n.a. 1757 50.2 (47.9–52.5) 51.1a (50.4–51.9) 73.8b (68.8–78.7)
Responders to ASQ 1175 52.8 (49.0–54.7) 56.6a (55.7–57.5) 57.3c (54.4–60.1) 1073 51.7 (48.7–54.7) 53.9a (53.1–54.8) 61.0d (58.1–64.0)
Available for OEGD n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 947 52.0 (48.8–55.1) 53.6 (52.6–54.5) 61.8e (58.6–64.9)
OEGD participants 2012 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 388 52.1 (47.1–57.1) 54.0 (52.7–55.4) 62.7f (57.9–67.6)

ASQ: Abdominal Symptom Questionnaire; CI: confidence interval; OEGD: oesophagogastroduodenoscopy; n.a.: data not available.

The proportion of women, mean age and (when applicable) proportion with higher education among the participants at four of the levels described in Figure 2 for all participants and for those <80 years old as that was an eligibility criterion for upper endoscopy. The statistical analysis are adjusted for age and gender.

a

p ≤ 0.01; bn = 305; cn = 1151; dn = 1052,; en = 931; fn = 381.