Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 29;11(9):e0163107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163107

Table 2. Mean general precision and standard deviation (SD), in μm, for partially and totally edentulous maxilla, and p values testing the scanner by model interaction.

N = 5 scans for each scanner and model type.

Scanner Partially edentulous maxilla Totally edentulous maxilla p-value1
Mean Precision ± SD (μm) Mean Precision ± SD (μm)
Trios® 51.0 ± 18.5 † ‡ 67.0 ± 32.2 † ‡ 0.4
CS 3500® 40.8 ± 6.4 § ¶ 55.2 ± 10.4 § ¶ 0.4
Zfx Intrascan® 126.2 ± 21.2 † § ° 112.4 ± 22.6 † § ° 0.5
Planscan® 219.8 ± 59.1 ‡ ¶ ° 204.2 ± 22.7 ‡ ¶ ° 0.4

The same symbol after SD indicates differences in trueness between scanner pairs (Tukey-adjustment for multiple comparison). Minimum significant difference across scanners: 59.5 μm and 42.2 μm for partially and totally edentulous maxilla models, respectively.

1 p-value testing of the interaction between scanner and model type (partially vs totally edentulous maxilla): a p-value > 0.05 indicates no difference in scanner precision according to model type.