Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 23;2(4):454–467. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2016.04.006

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Electrical activity. Response to IL10 treatment. (A) Variability of peak amplitudes in the distal stomach (regions 7–12). Means ± SEM. *P < .05, one-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction; n = 5. (B) Quantification of the interevent intervals (IEIs) for slow waves from all areas of all mice. Means ± SEM; n = 5. *P < .05, unpaired t test. (C) Resting membrane potential in the corpus (regions 1–3) and antrum (regions 7–9) of vehicle- and IL10-treated diabetic mice. Each point represents the membrane potential for each mouse. Statistical differences were determined by repeated measures 2-way analysis of variance with a Bonferroni post-test; N = 5 mice. (D) Resting membrane potential. Note the variance in the membrane potential across tissues was different. **P = .03, F-test; means for 12 recording sites; n = 5 mice. Whiskers, medians–interquartile range. Pk, peak.