Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Nephrol. 2016 Jun 5;31(11):2137–2144. doi: 10.1007/s00467-016-3425-2

Table 3.

Bivariate analysis comparing subjects with visit-to-visit systolic ARV in the 3rd tertile to subjects in the 1st tertile.

Neurocognitive Variable (at most recent visit) N Systolic BP ARV p-value (1st vs. 3rd)
1st tertile 2nd tertile 3rd tertile
Matrix Reasoning 535 49.4 ± 10.9 50.1 ± 9.4 47.7 ± 10.7 0.13
GEC (parent or self) 622 52.7 ± 11.5 52.7 ± 11.5 53.6 ± 12.2 0.44
Errors of Commission 487 50.7 ± 12.4 51.2 ± 12.1 52.6 ± 10.9 0.16
Digit Span Forward 475 8.6 ± 2.9 8.6 ± 3.2 8.2 ± 2.8 0.17
Digit Span Reverse 475 9.6 ± 3.1 9.8 ± 3.4 9.0 ± 3.1 0.09
Letter Fluency 281 9.4 ± 3.0 9.5 ± 3.8 8.6 ± 3.5 0.08
Category Fluency 281 10.6 ± 3.5 10.3 ± 3.4 9.5 ± 3.8 0.03
Category Switching 279 9.6 ± 2.6 9.2 ± 3.4 8.5 ± 3.2 0.02
Category Contrast 279 −1.2 ± 3.7 −1.1 ± 3.4 −1.0 ± 3.3 0.70

Note. Matrix Reasoning, GEC, and Errors of Commission are reported in T-Scores with a Mean = 50 and a Standard Deviation of 10. For Matrix Reasoning higher scores reflect a better performance; for GEC and Errors of Commission higher scores reflect a worse performance. Digit Span and D-KEF tasks are reported in scaled scores with a Mean = 10 and a Standard Deviation of 3, with higher scores reflecting a more intact performance.

*

average of Accuracy and Total scaled scores.

**

Contrast = Switching – Fluency.

BP ARV: blood pressure average real variability, GEC: Global Executive Composite