Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 21;19(9):pyw038. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyw038

Table 4.

The Results of Sensitivity Analysis for Relapse Prevention

Number of Studies Number of Patients I2 Risk Ratio 95% Confidence Interval P I2 Number Needed to Treat 95% Confidence Interval P
Study duration Long (≥ 15 months) 3 342 69% 1.20 0.65 to 2.19 .56
Short (< 15 months) 3 218 0% 0.61 0.46 to 0.81 .0008 ns
Blinding Double blind 2 385 92% 0.92 0.29 to 2.91 .89
Open 4 175 0% 0.75 0.58 to 0.97 .03 ns
Comparator Second generation antipsychotic monotherapy 3 349 69% 1.18 0.69 to 2.02 .55
Other oral medications * 3 211 0% 0.59 0.44 to 0.80 .0005 ns
Type of bipolar disorder Rapid cycling or high frequency of relapse patients 2 169 0% 0.58 0.43 to 0.79 .0004 0% -4 -7 to -3 <.0001
Others 4 391 31% 1.19 0.74 to 1.91 .48
Long-acting injectable antipsychotics Risperidone long-acting injectable 5 518 79% 0.86 0.54 to 1.36 .51
Flupenthixol decanoate 1 42 na 1.36 0.13 to 13.84 .80
Sample size Large (total number of patients > 100) 2 385 92% 0.92 0.29 to 2.91 .89
Small (total number of patients < 100) 4 175 0% 0.75 0.58 to 0.97 .03 ns

Abbreviations: na, not applicable; ns, not significant.

*Others: Mood stabilizers, antidepressants, antipsychotic or any combination of these agents