Table 3.
n=325 | |
---|---|
Secondary patient-satisfaction outcomes | |
Satisfaction with services received, mean (SD) (1= strongly disagree to 5= strongly agree) | |
History taken was thorough and done with competence.a | 4.57 (0.6) |
The physical examination was thorough and done with competence. | 4.64 (0.5) |
Results of investigations were well explained. | 4.52 (0.7) |
Diagnosis was well explained.a | 4.44 (0.8) |
Opportunity to discuss all questions.a | 4.57 (0.6) |
Happy with the answers to my questions.a | 4.55 (0.6) |
Recommendations, advice, and suggestions were helpful.a | 4.38 (0.7) |
Educational materials provided were useful.a,b | 4.13 (0.9) |
Satisfaction with wait time, n (%) | |
Acceptable wait from referral to appointment | |
Strongly agree | 144 (46.0) |
Agree | 130 (41.5) |
Neither agree nor disagree | 22 (7.0) |
Disagree | 13 (4.2) |
Strongly disagree | 4 (1.3) |
Acceptable wait in clinic today | |
Strongly agree | 145 (45.9) |
Agree | 129 (40.8) |
Neither agree nor disagree | 19 (6.0) |
Disagree | 18 (5.7) |
Strongly disagree | 5 (1.6) |
Satisfaction with care compared to previous arthritis care received from other health care professionals, n (%) | |
More satisfactory | 189 (61.6) |
Same | 113 (36.8) |
Less satisfactory | 5 (1.6) |
ACPAC program-trained therapist is the most appropriate health care professional to be seeing me, n (%) | |
Strongly agree | 147 (46.0) |
Agree | 125 (39.1) |
Neither agree nor disagree | 39 (12.2) |
Disagree | 8 (2.5) |
Strongly disagree | 1 (0.3) |
Overall satisfaction, mean (SD) | |
Overall quality of care (1= poor to 5= excellent) | 4.39 (0.8) |
Overall coordination of care (1= poor to 5= excellent) | 4.36 (0.8) |
Notes:
Items from the Group Health Association of America’s Consumer Satisfaction Survey;
number of missing responses from item “Educational materials provided were useful”: n=48 (14.8%).
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; ACPAC, Advanced Clinician Practitioner in Arthritis Care.