Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 19;7:45–53. doi: 10.2147/OARRR.S85783

Table 3.

Item-level scores for secondary patient-satisfaction outcomes

n=325
Secondary patient-satisfaction outcomes
Satisfaction with services received, mean (SD) (1= strongly disagree to 5= strongly agree)
 History taken was thorough and done with competence.a 4.57 (0.6)
 The physical examination was thorough and done with competence. 4.64 (0.5)
 Results of investigations were well explained. 4.52 (0.7)
 Diagnosis was well explained.a 4.44 (0.8)
 Opportunity to discuss all questions.a 4.57 (0.6)
 Happy with the answers to my questions.a 4.55 (0.6)
 Recommendations, advice, and suggestions were helpful.a 4.38 (0.7)
 Educational materials provided were useful.a,b 4.13 (0.9)
Satisfaction with wait time, n (%)
 Acceptable wait from referral to appointment
  Strongly agree 144 (46.0)
  Agree 130 (41.5)
  Neither agree nor disagree 22 (7.0)
  Disagree 13 (4.2)
  Strongly disagree 4 (1.3)
 Acceptable wait in clinic today
  Strongly agree 145 (45.9)
  Agree 129 (40.8)
  Neither agree nor disagree 19 (6.0)
  Disagree 18 (5.7)
  Strongly disagree 5 (1.6)
Satisfaction with care compared to previous arthritis care received from other health care professionals, n (%)
 More satisfactory 189 (61.6)
 Same 113 (36.8)
 Less satisfactory 5 (1.6)
ACPAC program-trained therapist is the most appropriate health care professional to be seeing me, n (%)
 Strongly agree 147 (46.0)
 Agree 125 (39.1)
 Neither agree nor disagree 39 (12.2)
 Disagree 8 (2.5)
 Strongly disagree 1 (0.3)
Overall satisfaction, mean (SD)
 Overall quality of care (1= poor to 5= excellent) 4.39 (0.8)
 Overall coordination of care (1= poor to 5= excellent) 4.36 (0.8)

Notes:

a

Items from the Group Health Association of America’s Consumer Satisfaction Survey;

b

number of missing responses from item “Educational materials provided were useful”: n=48 (14.8%).

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; ACPAC, Advanced Clinician Practitioner in Arthritis Care.