. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 1.

Published in final edited form as: Diabet Med. 2016 Apr 24;33(11):1528–1535. doi: 10.1111/dme.13126

Table 2.

Adjusted multivariable logistic regression model examining the effect of glycaemic exposure on incident weekly urinary incontinence status at EDIC year 17

Risk factors at EDIC year 10	Odds ratio (95% CI)	P
Attained age (per year)	1.02 (0.97, 1.06)	0.53
DCCT cohort (primary prevention vs secondary intervention)	0.90 (0.50, 1.64)	0.74
DCCT treatment group (intensive vs conventional)	1.71 (0.92, 3.19)	0.09
EDIC mean BMI up to year 10 (kg/m²)	1.05 (0.97, 1.12)	0.21
EDIC mean insulin dose up to year 10 (units/kg/day)	3.01 (0.50, 18.22)	0.23
Parity (n of live births)
1 vs 0	1.79 (0.75, 4.27)	0.23
≥2 vs 0	1.33 (0.63, 2.83)	0.99
Hysterectomy (yes vs no)	0.31 (0.08, 1.21)	0.09
Autonomic neuropathy (yes vs no)	1.03 (0.51, 2.08)	0.93
Urinary tract infection (within past year) (yes vs no)	1.34 (0.62, 2.91)	0.46
EDIC mean HbA_1c up to year 10 (mmol/mol)	1.03 (1.01, 1.06)	0.02
EDIC mean HbA_1c up to year 10 (%)	1.41 (1.07, 1.89)	0.02

DCCT, Diabetes Control and Complications Trial; EDIC, Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications study.