Table 5.

Top 5 enriched KEGG pathways among pairwise comparisons of flower, fruit, seed with shoots

Comparison	Pathway terms	Rich factora	q-valueb	No.c
Fruit vs shoot	Plant hormone signal transduction	0.44	3.06E−20	59
	Terpenoid backbone biosynthesis	0.19	0.0019	28
	Cutin, suberine and wax biosynthesis	0.51	2.31E−05	15
	Brassinosteroid biosynthesis	0.70	0.0052	7
	Flavonoid biosynthesis	0.2	3.73E−08	7
Flower vs shoot	Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis	0.031	4.18E−05	10
	Diterpenoid biosynthesis	0.25	4.18E−05	4
	Stilbenoid, diarylheptanoid and gingerol biosynthesis	0.145	0.00019	4
	Pentose and glucuronate interconversions	0.02	0.00065	10
	Plant hormone signal transduction	0.42	4.06E−14	56
Seeds vs shoot	Cutin, suberine and wax biosynthesis	0.62	4.45E−06	18
	Homologous recombination	0.3	0.010	18
	Carotenoid biosynthesis	0.37	0.012	13
	Stilbenoid, diarylheptanoid and gingerol biosynthesis	0.40	0.014	11

^aRich factor means that the ratio of the DEGs number and the number of genes have been annotated in this pathway. The greater of the Rich factor, the greater the degree of enrichment

^bThe q-value was calculated using hypergeometric test through Bonferroni Correction. Q value is corrected p value ranging from 0–1, and less Q value means greater intensiveness

^cUnigene number in each pathway